QQ in position, calling a 4 bet, no overcards hit flop
2/3/5 NL
V is 40's Filipino guy, somewhat loose, plays aggressive. His first hand at the table was a triple barrel bluff
I played another hand with this same Villain today. We haven't tangled since the original hand in this thread.
2/3/5 NL, 8 handed.
(I have the effective stack of $990.)
H opens to $20 utg+1 with AcJs.
HJ calls, B calls, SB calls and Villain in BB calls.
($100) Flop Qd Jc 3h
Checks around.
($100) Turn Jd
SB checks.
V bets $45.
H raises $200.
Folds to V, who tanks and raises to $500.
H goes all-in for total $970.
V calls.
River: Ad
V shows Kd Th
Later in the session, villain says to me "You are running good today."
I am going to look to play at this guy's tables in the future!
Not sure why we jamming flop.
Don't we want to keep his random bluffs in?
I think that in the moment, I was thinking that if I flat call, the villain may just shove the turn with his whole range.
And what do I do if the turn is an A,K,J,T - am I folding?
If you shove on top on the flop, might as well snap off any turn.
Yes we are never folding the flop with this specific hand, but sometimes you'll have weaker ranges here. Can you ship as well?
Keeping opponents weaker ranges in the hand is good as well. He'll either slowdown or barrel off.
The 2nd handhistory you showed in the replies that he bet/3bet w/oest8d on paired board shows villain is crazy aggressive. Because you never folding any valuehands to the 3bets.
With such in mind he might barrel off with random bluffs. Keeping qq in your calling range also balance the times when you have weaker holdings.
There is some element of equity denial, especially if villain's bluffs are very weighted towards AK.
Generally, calling is better when
1. Villain's bluffs are low in equity
2. Villain will likely continue bluffing if you call
And raising is better when the opposite is true.