Very Agressive table last night did I squeeze for too much?

Very Agressive table last night did I squeeze for too much?

9- handed 11 hours into session 2am I've had to chop 4 big hands tonight things barely getting anywhere
(table is all regulars smallest stack 225$ most stacks are 700$ plus)

UTG straddle for $6 entire table calls to me on SB with QQ (pot 42$)

I bet 75$ (eff 385$) everyone folds
Was this too big of a squeeze or better to not have speculative actors involved or should I have gone smaller? FYI: most of the time if betting pot here half the table is going to call.

25 January 2025 at 05:36 PM
Reply...

8 Replies



It may have been a tad big, but I wouldn't call it stupid-big. Sometimes we pick up a big hand, raise, and everyone just folds. It happens.

Does $60 get action? Maybe, but you'll be going to the flop OOP. Whether it's HU or multi-way, it'll be tough to navigate with less than 3 SPR.

Part of the problem may be you're not sitting deep enough for anyone to want to try set-mining. If you had $500 or more on the table, maybe you'd have gotten action.

60$ would have probably got 4 or 5 callers.


by pnut007z

60$ would have probably got 4 or 5 callers.

Maybe. But 4 or 5 is better than 0, amirite?


It's big, but OOP vs eight players, it's fine. ~$60 might be better, but once you get a caller it will probably domino and you'll get two or three more, which wouldn't be great 😉

true that, unless I was just going to flip anyways which I was totally okay with.


hand is fine, could even shove and try making it look like you're punting

I was actually thinking that. It would have looked super sus too.


As said not unnecessarily big but I also agree with ~60

Reply...