2024 ELECTION THREAD

2024 ELECTION THREAD

The next presidential race will be here soon! Please see current Bovada odds. Thoughts?

14 July 2022 at 02:28 PM
Reply...

20208 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by housenuts

^ love how America now is simply attacking the other side.

Neither party, nor their media accomplices, talk about the good that they will do. It's only attacks on the other candidate.

Sad state of affairs.

Yes I always love when people Intervene in a fight blaming both side while disregarding that one side just decided to say enough is enough and to strike back for self defence, after been hit hundreds time before …
And claiming in the end they are the same .


by Montrealcorp

And claiming in the end they are the same .

Equality for all!


by pocket_zeros

CNBC: How Elon Musk’s endorsement of Trump may have backfired

Harris’ campaign added in a statement soon after the event: “Trump’s entire campaign is in service of people like Elon Musk and himself — self-obsessed rich guys who will sell out the middle class and who cannot run a livestream in the year 2024.” (The event was delayed 40 minutes by technical difficulties.)

i'm sure getting cuckerberg on board will set things straight


Tech billionaires face a hard balancing act.

They went straight into helping democrats for years a little maybe because they share socially progressive views, and mostly because they felt safe economically doing that.

But after the shocking google antitrust case many of them feel deeply betrayed and they aren't sure how to protect their interests in the best way.

Some think neutrality and talking as little as possible protect them, a few think that donating to both sides a la Buffett can work, and a few changed sides in a gamble that might very well backfire.

But I don't think we can confidently claim today who among them made the right decisions, yet


by 72off

i'm sure getting cuckerberg on board will set things straight

Zuck is definitely going to regret his strategy in the next four years.


The Democrat Party has been ramping up their lawfare against Tesla and SpaceX for years. Just endless lawsuits. Buying Twitter and endorsing Trump was a calculated gamble by Elon to stave off the attacks. As is, it looks unlikely to work, but sometimes gambles dont play out. If you were planning on buying a front row ticket to Mars, I would make other plans. There probably wont be much left of SpaceX by the time the Democrats are done with it.


The name is "Democratic Party."


by Dunyain

The Democrat Party has been ramping up their lawfare against Tesla and SpaceX for years. Just endless lawsuits. Buying Twitter and endorsing Trump was a calculated gamble by Elon to stave off the attacks. As is, it looks unlikely to work, but sometimes gambles dont play out. If you were planning on buying a front row ticket to Mars, I would make other plans. There probably

Name one lawsuit.


by checkraisdraw

Name one lawsuit.

Are you serious or ironic?

Musk v NLRB

SEC investigating Twitter buyout

Tesla autopilot investigated

Steering loss investigation

NLBR vs spaceX

DoJ after SpaceX because it doesn't hire refugees

Tesla racism case (US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission)


by housenuts

Equality for all!

It’s more about treat farly all ….
And if you would have , u would have wait a little more punching being thrown around by democrats before calling it the same .


by Gorgonian

The name is "Democratic Party."

It is still a gross misnomer no matter how you try and spin it.


by Luciom

Tech billionaires face a hard balancing act. They went straight into helping democrats for years a little maybe because they share socially progressive views, and mostly because they felt safe economically doing that. But after the shocking google antitrust case many of them feel deeply betrayed and they aren't sure how to protect their interests in the best way.Some think neut

If that was the case , are you for or against monopolies?


by MSchu18

It is still a gross misnomer no matter how you try and spin it.

What?

I corrected an error, I didn't spin anything.


by Luciom

Are you serious or ironic?

Musk v NLRB

SEC investigating Twitter buyout

Tesla autopilot investigated

Steering loss investigation

NLBR vs spaceX

DoJ after SpaceX because it doesn't hire refugees

Tesla racism case (US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission)

Which of these do you think was bullshit political persecution?


by housenuts

^ love how America now is simply attacking the other side.

Neither party, nor their media accomplices, talk about the good that they will do. It's only attacks on the other candidate.

Sad state of affairs.

lol, now?


by The Horror

lol, now?

Always


by Luciom

Are you serious or ironic?

Musk v NLRB

SEC investigating Twitter buyout

Tesla autopilot investigated

Steering loss investigation

NLBR vs spaceX

DoJ after SpaceX because it doesn't hire refugees

Tesla racism case (US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission)

The claim was that there was lawfare. I want to know which of these cases qualifies as lawfare.


by housenuts

Always

USA
USA
USA


by Montrealcorp

Yes I always love when people Intervene in a fight blaming both side while disregarding that one side just decided to say enough is enough and to strike back for self defence, after been hit hundreds time before …
And claiming in the end they are the same .

its also just actual honest. Harris campaign knows they wont do anything good so they arent even pandering.


by Victor

its also just actual honest. Harris campaign knows they wont do anything good so they arent even pandering.

I doubt government do 100% wrong .


by Montrealcorp

If that was the case , are you for or against monopolies?

The Google antitrust case had strong bipartisan support. Started by the Trump DOJ and a bunch of red state attorneys general, continued/expanded by Biden DOJ.


Claims of "lawfare" is the latest incarnation of Republican psychological projection, ie they have zero evidence Democrats are actually engaged in it while ignoring the ample evidence of Trump's explicit attempts to use it, as in audio and video recordings of him asking a foreign leader and his AG to investigate his political rivals.


by pocket_zeros

Claims of "lawfare" is the latest incarnation of Republican psychological projection, ie they have zero evidence Democrats are actually engaged in it while ignoring the ample evidence of Trump's explicit attempts to use it, as in audio and video recordings of him asking a foreign leader and his AG to investigate his political rivals.

Dems are better at hiding it? The drummed up election interference case is full on lawfare.


Trump's AG appointed a special prosecutor.... later Trump was caught soliciting foreign interference and asking for states to be rigged in his favor in the 2020 election.


by pocket_zeros

Claims of "lawfare" is the latest incarnation of Republican psychological projection, ie they have zero evidence Democrats are actually engaged in it while ignoring the ample evidence of Trump's explicit attempts to use it, as in audio and video recordings of him asking a foreign leader and his AG to investigate his political rivals.

Is "lawfare" some new buzzword invented by the right wing derposhere?

Those guys are prolific. I'll give them that much.

Reply...