Super Bowl 58: #3 Kansas City Chiefs vs #1 San Francisco 49ers (-1)

Super Bowl 58: #3 Kansas City Chiefs vs #1 San Francisco 49ers (-1)

29 January 2024 at 05:08 AM
Reply...

1660 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

Why the **** would they win the toss and take the ball under these rules?


And don't ever advise me about QB yardage over/under rushing props again. Nobody on earth.


49ers won the toss and chose to receive?

seems like it would be an advantage to get the ball last under these new OT rules.


WHY WOULD YOU TAKE THE BALL?


Yea second team knows when to go on 4th down, don't think I would want ball unless D is gassed


by StoppedRainingMen

Dry heaving more rn

Keep at it long enough. You'll get some gut to come up.


by Lawnmower Man

WHY WOULD YOU TAKE THE BALL?

rest defense, Tony romo said it so it must be true


My bad for forgetting the Pats-Falcons but really who could blame me? ATL were drawing dead by that time. This is way more up for grabs but gotta be slightly favoring KC.


Knowing if you have to go for it is obviously great but so is getting the ball next if both (or neither) teams score. It might well be better to kick but I doubt it's a huge mistake.


somebody check on SRM


by Lawnmower Man

WHY WOULD YOU TAKE THE BALL?

For the extra possession.


sick trickery on that play


what in the Andy Reid was that play?


by Tom Ames

Keep at it long enough. You'll get some gut to come up.

he did have +4k calories before the game even started.

But he didn't have Popeye's. Did I mention it's delicious?


lol professional coaches


pinny

SF -104
KC -112


wtf was that play


borktacular

edit: lol some rigged ass bullshit, great


riggage is strong


Coaches have each been paid to throw the game.


omg


REFS MVP


asdfasdjhfj


"that's a good call right there"

i've never seen such standard contact, pretty sure it was within 5 yds


Thats an inopportune time to Hold

Reply...