Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
no? do you understand how object permanence works? how about temporal precedence?
Reindeer games.
Are you trying to make some bizarre point to dustbox? Have that ever worked?
You tried to pro tip me.
Whatever it is I do here I am pro at it.
Figuring out exactly what you knuckleheads are on about isn't part of my gimmick.
You tried to pro tip me.
Whatever it is I do here I am pro at it.
Figuring out exactly what you knuckleheads are on about isn't part of my gimmick.
Fair enough.
But I don't appreciate being called 'knucklehead.' I prefer being called 'bigot', 'moron', 'idiot' or 'racist.'
Thanking you in advance!
That reminds me of something, Dm sent.
CRD has never been good at hypotheticals so I wouldn't worry too much Amp.
You “probably” would if “all aspects” pointed to it being a false flag? That’s weird because in the Sandy Hook case you call it a false flag and “all aspects” don’t point to it being a false flag. So in the hypothetical case where “all aspects” point to it being a false flag you have such a high epistemic burden that you’re not sure if you would call it one, but in the real case where most aspects point to it not being a false flag you do call it one?
You “probably” would if “all aspects” pointed to it being a false flag? That’s weird because in the Sandy Hook case you call it a false flag and “all aspects” don’t point to it being a false flag. So in the hypothetical case where “all aspects” point to it being a false flag you have such a high epistemic burden that you’re not sure if you would call it one, but in the real cas
You can be really exasperating at times I'm sure you know.
"What if there were no hypotheticals?"- Steven Wright
Hey Luckbox, I notice you've been avoiding my question. What shape is the Earth?