*** June 2025 High Stakes Thread ***
*** June 2025 High Stakes Thread ***
8
zs

*** June 2025 High Stakes Thread ***

Hello and welcome to the arena!

Previous High Stakes thread: *** May 2025 High Stakes Thread ***

We generally post ~200bb+

01 June 2025 at 05:11 AM
Reply...

238 Replies

8
zs


by ggbruuce m
by Mike Haven m

Fyi, Cam Barry, (CTB123 GlobalPoker; MattParker CoinPoker), has a very serious problem with his CoinPoker account. Please see https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28/di...

Not a single hs reg try to defend him or say a positive thing in his favor. Must be legit..... "serious problem"

No one aside from a few American players knows who I am, so I'm not surprised no one is jumping to my defense. If all things are equal their investigation will exonerate my play as I was not, nor have I ever cheated in poker.

I beat dogecoinmaximaliste very badly in one session, kennedyp less so over 2 sessions, and did ok v yodogoki. I also got absolutely crushed by tony1993 and cumicon over multiple sessions. Apparently that's enough to get my account restricted and unfortunately coinpoker support and security are so insanely slow that after two weeks, they're still reviewing my play. They have said nothing about it so far.

It's quite scary to face this kind of action and have no contact from support for over a week. I can't wait to get back onto coinpoker but this experience has been harrowing.


by Zamadhi m

It seems that Stefan is trying too hard to push volume.

Last year when he tried to make a comeback at GG NL1k, he played 200k hands in 2 months and ended down 70 buyins.

Now he's played 43k hands in a week (13k hands more than anyone else) and he's one of the biggest losers.

The luckiest will win it anyway. It is just so stupid to play that many hands, especially with quite thin egdes.


by Papicoolo m

The luckiest will win it anyway. It is just so stupid to play that many hands, especially with quite thin egdes.

yea thats why all tournaments are stupid too.
just as stupid as playing without paying rake.


Thanks for your knowledge.

He didn‘t manage to win with less volume on regular tables. Put in even more volume and play your worst game against decent players. Build up very deep stacks, because the decent players don‘t know how to exploit it and your winrate is going to skyrocket.

And of course the next main event champion is going to be considered as the world‘s best player!!


Luck will absolutely play a part in who wins, but it's the player who has the highest $EV that wins, not the person that wins the most.


I was always wondering what‘s the difference between the std. dev. of the actual winrate and the ev winrate.
Anybody has an idea?

I‘ve just run both of my graphs through ai and it shows that the AI-Ev graph is actually more volatile?

Sorry for off topic.


CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

KayhanMok (SB): §31,248.40 (156 bb)
Clickr (BB): §36,198 (181 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
KayhanMok (SB) raises to §500, Clickr (BB) 3-bets to §1,900, KayhanMok (SB) calls §1,400

Flop: (§3,800) J 7 K (2 players)
Clickr (BB) checks, KayhanMok (SB) bets §1,900, Clickr (BB) calls §1,900

Turn: (§7,600) T (2 players)
Clickr (BB) checks, KayhanMok (SB) checks

River: (§7,600) T (2 players)
Clickr (BB) bets §11,400, KayhanMok (SB) calls §11,400

Total pot: §30,400 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
Clickr (BB) shows 9 9 (two pair, Tens and Nines)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 54%, Flop: 56%, Turn: 16%, River: 0%)

KayhanMok (SB) shows T Q (three of a kind, Tens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 46%, Flop: 44%, Turn: 84%, River: 100%)

KayhanMok (SB) wins §30,400

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

KayhanMok (SB): §20,300 (102 bb)
Clickr (BB): §20,560 (103 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
KayhanMok (SB) raises to §500, Clickr (BB) 3-bets to §2,100, KayhanMok (SB) calls §1,600

Flop: (§4,200) 2 4 9 (2 players)
Clickr (BB) bets §2,800, KayhanMok (SB) calls §2,800

Turn: (§9,800) 8 (2 players)
Clickr (BB) bets §15,660 (all-in), KayhanMok (SB) calls §15,400 (all-in)

River: (§40,600) K (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: §40,600 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
Clickr (BB) shows A Q (high card, Ace)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 71%, Flop: 84%, Turn: 75%, River: 0%)

KayhanMok (SB) shows K Q (a pair of Kings)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 29%, Flop: 16%, Turn: 25%, River: 100%)

KayhanMok (SB) wins §40,600

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

Clickr (SB): §25,438 (127 bb)
KayhanMok (BB): §38,922 (195 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
Clickr (SB) raises to §460, KayhanMok (BB) calls §260

Flop: (§920) 7 2 Q (2 players)
KayhanMok (BB) checks, Clickr (SB) bets §276, KayhanMok (BB) raises to §1,200, Clickr (SB) calls §924

Turn: (§3,320) Q (2 players)
KayhanMok (BB) checks, Clickr (SB) bets §1,700, KayhanMok (BB) calls §1,700

River: (§6,720) J (2 players)
KayhanMok (BB) bets §1,644, Clickr (SB) calls §1,644

Total pot: §10,008 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
KayhanMok (BB) shows A 4 (a pair of Queens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 53%, Flop: 18%, Turn: 0%, River: 0%)

Clickr (SB) shows T Q (three of a kind, Queens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 47%, Flop: 82%, Turn: 100%, River: 100%)

Clickr (SB) wins §10,008

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

Clickr (SB): §28,582.40 (143 bb)
KayhanMok (BB): §21,850 (109 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
Clickr (SB) raises to §460, KayhanMok (BB) 3-bets to §2,100, Clickr (SB) calls §1,640

Flop: (§4,200) 6 A 9 (2 players)
KayhanMok (BB) bets §1,400, Clickr (SB) calls §1,400

Turn: (§7,000) T (2 players)
KayhanMok (BB) checks, Clickr (SB) bets §5,250, KayhanMok (BB) raises to §18,350 (all-in), Clickr (SB) calls §13,100

River: (§43,700) 3 (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: §43,700 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
KayhanMok (BB) shows A 9 (two pair, Aces and Nines)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 60%, Flop: 60%, Turn: 70%, River: 100%)

Clickr (SB) shows 6 T (two pair, Tens and Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 40%, Flop: 40%, Turn: 30%, River: 0%)

KayhanMok (BB) wins §43,700


CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

KayhanMok (SB): §29,321.80 (147 bb)
Clickr (BB): §23,300 (117 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
KayhanMok (SB) raises to §500, Clickr (BB) 3-bets to §2,100, KayhanMok (SB) 4-bets to §5,100, Clickr (BB) calls §3,000

Flop: (§10,200) 6 9 3 (2 players)
Clickr (BB) checks, KayhanMok (SB) bets §2,000, Clickr (BB) calls §2,000

Turn: (§14,200) 7 (2 players)
Clickr (BB) checks, KayhanMok (SB) bets §4,000, Clickr (BB) calls §4,000

River: (§22,200) 5 (2 players)
Clickr (BB) checks, KayhanMok (SB) bets §16,650, Clickr (BB) calls §12,200 (all-in)

Total pot: §46,600 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
KayhanMok (SB) shows 9 9 (three of a kind, Nines)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 55%, Flop: 100%, Turn: 100%, River: 100%)

Clickr (BB) shows A Q (high card, Ace)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 45%, Flop: 0%, Turn: 0%, River: 0%)

KayhanMok (SB) wins §46,600


by Papicoolo m

I was always wondering what‘s the difference between the std. dev. of the actual winrate and the ev winrate.
Anybody has an idea?

I‘ve just run both of my graphs through ai and it shows that the AI-Ev graph is actually more volatile?

Sorry for off topic.

All-in ev doesn't matter. Net won reflects it all..


CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

Clickr (SB): §30,942 (155 bb)
KayhanMok (BB): §33,418 (167 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
Clickr (SB) raises to §480, KayhanMok (BB) calls §280

Flop: (§960) A 9 2 (2 players)
KayhanMok (BB) checks, Clickr (SB) bets §288, KayhanMok (BB) calls §288

Turn: (§1,536) J (2 players)
KayhanMok (BB) checks, Clickr (SB) checks

River: (§1,536) K (2 players)
KayhanMok (BB) bets §1,152, Clickr (SB) raises to §4,032, KayhanMok (BB) raises to §16,032, Clickr (SB) raises to §30,174 (all-in), KayhanMok (BB) folds

Total pot: §33,600 (Rake: §0)
Clickr (SB) wins §33,600

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

KayhanMok (SB): §42,200 (211 bb)
Clickr (BB): §30,421.80 (152 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
KayhanMok (SB) raises to §500, Clickr (BB) 3-bets to §1,900, KayhanMok (SB) 4-bets to §5,100, Clickr (BB) calls §3,200

Flop: (§10,200) A 7 8 (2 players)
Clickr (BB) checks, KayhanMok (SB) bets §1,800, Clickr (BB) raises to §4,400, KayhanMok (SB) calls §2,600

Turn: (§19,000) 3 (2 players)
Clickr (BB) bets §7,980, KayhanMok (SB) raises to §25,460, Clickr (BB) calls §12,941.80 (all-in)

River: (§60,843.60) 4 (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: §60,843.60 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
KayhanMok (SB) shows Q A (a pair of Aces - higher kicker)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 75%, Flop: 84%, Turn: 93%, River: 100%)

Clickr (BB) shows A J (a pair of Aces)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 25%, Flop: 16%, Turn: 7%, River: 0%)

KayhanMok (SB) wins §60,843.60


by Zamadhi m

It seems that Stefan is trying too hard to push volume.

Last year when he tried to make a comeback at GG NL1k, he played 200k hands in 2 months and ended down 70 buyins.

Now he's played 43k hands in a week (13k hands more than anyone else) and he's one of the biggest losers.

Drug is a helluva drug


Stefan results…. 50/100 skill level isn’t too different than 2/5.

Have been saying this for years… competition is more or less the same, dif is mindset and a little bit of lucky.

Stefan results kinda proves my point

The 500/1k 6max that been posted here from GG, any 0.5/1 reg could beat that. One epic whale 90vpip…

Ps; take my opinion with grain of salt because it’s been a long time since I don’t play anything…


Yea some bumhunters at 50/100 not big difference theoretically as 2/5 maybe but strong players and also playing vs fish and other soft skills insane difference imo
Bigger skill difference than from NL25 to NL500 imo

Stefan cleary is not the same he once was no point in making comparisons


Also quite some 1k,2k regs playing the NL500 challenge so level prob abit higher than usually at this stake anyway?


by chrisgaui m

Yea some bumhunters at 50/100 not big difference theoretically as 2/5 maybe but strong players and also playing vs fish and other soft skills insane difference imo
Bigger skill difference than from NL25 to NL500 imo

Stefan cleary is not the same he once was no point in making comparisons

theoretically is much much much different than in practice. it's very easy to know the theory and "play well in theory" when no money is involved but for people all the sudden 10x their normal stakes and go on a 10, 20, 40 buy in downswing and now theory goes out the window in 99.9% of cases

or....

Like Mike Tyson said "everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face"

the value of having been there and done that before, having faced big $$ swings before is incredibly valuable


by urubu222 m

Stefan results…. 50/100 skill level isn’t too different than 2/5.Have been saying this for years… competition is more or less the same, dif is mindset and a little bit of lucky. Stefan results kinda proves my pointThe 500/1k 6max that been posted here from GG, any 0.5/1 reg could beat that. One epic whale 90vpip… Ps; take my opinion with grain of salt because it’s been a long t

Stefans results proves my point that playing 24h+ sessions on drugs is bad mmkay


by throwaway1million m

No one aside from a few American players knows who I am, so I'm not surprised no one is jumping to my defense. If all things are equal their investigation will exonerate my play as I was not, nor have I ever cheated in poker. I beat dogecoinmaximaliste very badly in one session, kennedyp less so over 2 sessions, and did ok v yodogoki. I also got absolutely crushed by tony1993 a

IÂ’ve been playing with CTB for years on Global. HeÂ’s never quits a table / plays heads up with anyone and everyone, and has done so for years - literally never refusing action. He does many non-GTO things and plays lightning fast. I think itÂ’s pretty obvious heÂ’s not cheating. Do any Global regs disagree?

It makes me sad to see his account frozen like this. As someone who also wants to build up my roll and take a shot at high stakes someday, is this what happens? You have a winning session vs a high stakes player and that automatically makes you a cheater?

I appreciate CoinÂ’s concern for game integrity, but their apparent laziness when it comes to this investigation / communication is deeply disturbing. Do they intend to pay interest on the $220k theyÂ’ve frozen? ThatÂ’s a serious amount of money. How is this not a top priority for them?

Does anyone have a single shred of evidence against Cam? Do the players that beat him badly on Coin have any thoughts on the matter?


CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

asianflushie (SB): §37,317.80 (187 bb)
LLinusLL0ve (BB): §20,836.40 (104 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
asianflushie (SB) raises to §500, LLinusLL0ve (BB) 3-bets to §2,100, asianflushie (SB) calls §1,600

Flop: (§4,200) J 5 2 (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) bets §3,024, asianflushie (SB) calls §3,024

Turn: (§10,248) 4 (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) checks, asianflushie (SB) checks

River: (§10,248) J (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) checks, asianflushie (SB) bets §7,686, LLinusLL0ve (BB) raises to §15,712.40 (all-in), asianflushie (SB) calls §8,026.40

Total pot: §41,672.80 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
LLinusLL0ve (BB) shows Q A (a pair of Jacks)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 45%, Flop: 27%, Turn: 23%, River: 0%)

asianflushie (SB) shows 8 8 (two pair, Jacks and Eights)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 55%, Flop: 73%, Turn: 77%, River: 100%)

asianflushie (SB) wins §41,672.80

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

LLinusLL0ve (SB): §20,000 (100 bb)
asianflushie (BB): §58,884.20 (294 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
LLinusLL0ve (SB) raises to §500, asianflushie (BB) 3-bets to §2,000, LLinusLL0ve (SB) calls §1,500

Flop: (§4,000) J T 4 (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §1,600, asianflushie (BB) calls §1,600

Turn: (§7,200) 3 (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §5,184, asianflushie (BB) calls §5,184

River: (§17,568) A (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §11,216 (all-in), asianflushie (BB) calls §11,216

Total pot: §40,000 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
LLinusLL0ve (SB) shows 9 J (a flush, Ace high)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 49%, Flop: 87%, Turn: 98%, River: 100%)

asianflushie (BB) shows 7 7 (a pair of Sevens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 51%, Flop: 13%, Turn: 2%, River: 0%)

LLinusLL0ve (SB) wins §40,000

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

LLinusLL0ve (SB): §20,000 (100 bb)
asianflushie (BB): §55,480.20 (277 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
LLinusLL0ve (SB) raises to §500, asianflushie (BB) 3-bets to §2,000, LLinusLL0ve (SB) 4-bets to §5,000, asianflushie (BB) calls §3,000

Flop: (§10,000) J Q T (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §1,500, asianflushie (BB) calls §1,500

Turn: (§13,000) A (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §3,200, asianflushie (BB) calls §3,200

River: (§19,400) 6 (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §10,300 (all-in), asianflushie (BB) calls §10,300

Total pot: §40,000 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
LLinusLL0ve (SB) shows 8 5 (high card, Ace)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 38%, Flop: 6%, Turn: 3%, River: 0%)

asianflushie (BB) shows K Q (a straight, Ten to Ace)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 62%, Flop: 94%, Turn: 97%, River: 100%)

asianflushie (BB) wins §40,000

They've been battling for a while today


Saw some review guy on youtube claim he thought flushie would beat LLinus over a large sample. Is this common conception nowadays?


Game over, some of the other big pots/coolers below

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

LLinusLL0ve (SB): §22,355.80 (112 bb)
asianflushie (BB): §43,479 (217 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
LLinusLL0ve (SB) raises to §500, asianflushie (BB) 3-bets to §2,000, LLinusLL0ve (SB) calls §1,500

Flop: (§4,000) Q T T (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) bets §960, LLinusLL0ve (SB) raises to §2,795.20, asianflushie (BB) calls §1,835.20

Turn: (§9,590.40) J (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) bets §3,100, LLinusLL0ve (SB) raises to §7,500, asianflushie (BB) raises to §38,683.80 (all-in), LLinusLL0ve (SB) calls §10,060.60 (all-in)

River: (§44,711.60) 8 (2 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: §44,711.60 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
asianflushie (BB) shows 8 9 (a straight, Eight to Queen)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 38%, Flop: 15%, Turn: 61%, River: 100%)

LLinusLL0ve (SB) shows K T (three of a kind, Tens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 62%, Flop: 85%, Turn: 39%, River: 0%)

asianflushie (BB) wins §22,355.80
LLinusLL0ve (SB) wins §22,355.80

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

asianflushie (SB): §20,000 (100 bb)
LLinusLL0ve (BB): §44,395.80 (222 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
asianflushie (SB) raises to §500, LLinusLL0ve (BB) calls §300

Flop: (§1,000) 2 6 J (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) checks, asianflushie (SB) bets §240, LLinusLL0ve (BB) raises to §1,305.60, asianflushie (SB) calls §1,065.60

Turn: (§3,611.20) 8 (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) bets §4,400, asianflushie (SB) calls §4,400

River: (§12,411.20) T (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) bets §38,190.20 (all-in), asianflushie (SB) calls §13,794.40 (all-in)

Total pot: §40,000 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
LLinusLL0ve (BB) shows 5 4 (high card, Jack)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 37%, Flop: 24%, Turn: 18%, River: 0%)

asianflushie (SB) shows T J (two pair, Jacks and Tens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 63%, Flop: 76%, Turn: 82%, River: 100%)

asianflushie (SB) wins §40,000

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

LLinusLL0ve (SB): §37,553.20 (188 bb)
asianflushie (BB): §22,700 (114 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
LLinusLL0ve (SB) raises to §500, asianflushie (BB) 3-bets to §2,000, LLinusLL0ve (SB) calls §1,500

Flop: (§4,000) Q 8 4 (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §1,600, asianflushie (BB) calls §1,600

Turn: (§7,200) 2 (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §5,184, asianflushie (BB) calls §5,184

River: (§17,568) 9 (2 players)
asianflushie (BB) checks, LLinusLL0ve (SB) bets §28,769.20 (all-in), asianflushie (BB) calls §13,916 (all-in)

Total pot: §45,400 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
LLinusLL0ve (SB) shows K Q (a pair of Queens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 62%, Flop: 49%, Turn: 68%, River: 0%)

asianflushie (BB) shows 9 8 (two pair, Nines and Eights)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 38%, Flop: 51%, Turn: 32%, River: 100%)

asianflushie (BB) wins §45,400

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

asianflushie (SB): §32,344 (162 bb)
LLinusLL0ve (BB): §22,817.40 (114 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
asianflushie (SB) raises to §500, LLinusLL0ve (BB) 3-bets to §2,100, asianflushie (SB) calls §1,600

Flop: (§4,200) J Q 9 (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) bets §500, asianflushie (SB) raises to §2,600, LLinusLL0ve (BB) calls §2,100

Turn: (§9,400) 5 (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) checks, asianflushie (SB) bets §4,000, LLinusLL0ve (BB) calls §4,000

River: (§17,400) 4 (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) checks, asianflushie (SB) bets §23,644 (all-in), LLinusLL0ve (BB) calls §14,117.40 (all-in)

Total pot: §45,634.80 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
asianflushie (SB) shows A Q (a pair of Queens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 29%, Flop: 44%, Turn: 27%, River: 0%)

LLinusLL0ve (BB) shows K K (a pair of Kings)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 71%, Flop: 56%, Turn: 73%, River: 100%)

LLinusLL0ve (BB) wins §45,634.80

CoinPoker, Hold'em No Limit - §100/§200 - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

asianflushie (SB): §38,832 (194 bb)
LLinusLL0ve (BB): §26,568 (133 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§300)
asianflushie (SB) raises to §500, LLinusLL0ve (BB) 3-bets to §2,000, asianflushie (SB) calls §1,500

Flop: (§4,000) 8 6 8 (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) bets §1,600, asianflushie (SB) calls §1,600

Turn: (§7,200) T (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) checks, asianflushie (SB) bets §5,400, LLinusLL0ve (BB) calls §5,400

River: (§18,000) 4 (2 players)
LLinusLL0ve (BB) checks, asianflushie (SB) bets §29,832 (all-in), LLinusLL0ve (BB) calls §17,568 (all-in)

Total pot: §53,136 (Rake: §0)

Showdown:
asianflushie (SB) shows 5 7 (a straight, Four to Eight)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 20%, Flop: 28%, Turn: 18%, River: 100%)

LLinusLL0ve (BB) shows A A (two pair, Aces and Eights)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 80%, Flop: 72%, Turn: 82%, River: 0%)

asianflushie (SB) wins §53,136


by Kebabkungen m

Saw some review guy on youtube claim he thought flushie would beat LLinus over a large sample. Is this common conception nowadays?

From what I remember, they battled previously and Linus quit?

It would be really interesting to know some history behind Bjorn Li, as it seems like he's been an end boss of NLH for a very long time, willing to battle anyone but flown under the radar.


by Noobtard m

From what I remember, they battled previously and Linus quit?

It would be really interesting to know some history behind Bjorn Li, as it seems like he's been an end boss of NLH for a very long time, willing to battle anyone but flown under the radar.

Def didnt fly under the radar for most people who play hsnl i think. He used to post here on 2p2, did a prop bet of some kind where he chipdumped like 15 years ago or smth. Got permbanned from stars, made a new account under asianflushie (everyone always knew it was him so nothing fishy). Played 6max/hu at the highest stakes for many years > did start playing in macao > think someone ratted him out at some point so he got banned from flushie account too and then just played big private matches hu vs everyone for absurd volume. Forgot he also did that hu bot challenge with doug etc, but cant really remember where that was in the timeline. All in all not low key or under the radar at all, been around way longer than most hsnl regs.

There also used to be a rumor that he was behind every reggy chinese account after the asianflushie account was banned but idk.


by Noobtard m

From what I remember, they battled previously and Linus quit?

It would be really interesting to know some history behind Bjorn Li, as it seems like he's been an end boss of NLH for a very long time, willing to battle anyone but flown under the radar.



source.

Bjorn hasn't really "flown under the radar", per se. he's been a main staple of these monthly threads for a almost two decades, but i do agree that it would be cool to learn more about him. i contend that an AMA is in order considering what a ****ing legend dude is.


CoinPoker, Omaha Pot Limit - §50/§100 (§20 ante) - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

Madig (SB): §16,066 (161 bb)
GucciNIKE (BB): §36,995.50 (370 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§190)
Madig (SB) raises to §300, GucciNIKE (BB) 3-bets to §900, Madig (SB) calls §600

Flop: (§1,840) T 8 5 (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) bets §548.62, Madig (SB) raises to §2,011.61, GucciNIKE (BB) raises to §7,863.58, Madig (SB) raises to §15,146.01, GucciNIKE (BB) calls §7,282.42

Turn: (§32,132) K (2 players, 0 all-in)

River: (§32,132) 4 (2 players, 0 all-in)

Total pot: §32,132 (Rake: §11.20)

Showdown:
Madig (SB) shows 5 Q A 8 (two pair, Eights and Fives)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 36%, Flop: 2%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)

GucciNIKE (BB) shows 8 Q A 8 (three of a kind, Eights)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 64%, Flop: 98%, Turn: 95%, River: 100%)

GucciNIKE (BB) wins §32,120.80


CoinPoker, 5 Card Omaha Pot Limit - ₮25/₮50 (₮10 ante) - 2 players

firmino999 (SB): ₮7,940.60 (159 bb)
ilsy (BB): ₮5,442.50 (109 bb)

Pre-Flop: (₮95)
firmino999 (SB) raises to ₮150, ilsy (BB) raises to ₮450, firmino999 (SB) calls ₮300

Flop: (₮900) 8 T Q (2 players)
ilsy (BB) bets ₮301.12, firmino999 (SB) calls ₮301.12

Turn: (₮1,502.24) 5 (2 players)
ilsy (BB) checks, firmino999 (SB) bets ₮1,136.05, ilsy (BB) calls ₮1,136.05

River: (₮3,774.34) K (2 players)
ilsy (BB) bets ₮3,545.33 (all-in), firmino999 (SB) calls ₮3,545.33

Total pot: ₮10,885 (Rake: ₮7.50)

Showdown:
ilsy (BB) shows A J 6 Q A (a straight, Ace high)

firmino999 (SB) shows 9 9 J 2 4 (a straight, King high)

ilsy (BB) wins ₮10,877.50

Reply...