Nicholas J. Fuentes, Candace Owens, and other Right Wing Grifters

Nicholas J. Fuentes, Candace Owens, and other Right Wing Grifters

This fkn guy.. haven’t heard of him before 🤡🎯but when I did, I was overwhelmed. He’s a phenomenal speake

26 September 2025 at 08:39 PM
Reply...

447 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

OP here. Morgan’s “interview” clearly showed that Fuentes is an actor, a PsyOp which objective is this:



by QtangPendek

OP here. Morgan’s “interview” clearly showed that Fuentes is an actor, a PsyOp which objective is this:

I was just thinking that the forum needed another person who thinks that everything is a psyop.


by Rococo

I was just thinking that the forum needed another person who thinks that everything is a psyop.

Point, but HE is


by QtangPendek

Point, but HE is

The real question is can he maintain that celibacy until the 2036 election.


by formula72

The real question is can he maintain that celibacy until the 2036 election.

Word on the street is that when you do it with non-cis girls it’s still a celibacy, at least for him


A big part of the incel shtick is to be mocked for being an incel, which then allows the incels to go "see?!" and attract more young people who are sexually inexperienced and insecure about it to the cause.

The incel subculture has also been ripe recruitment grounds for the far right.


Fuentes is not an incel, he’s voluntarily celibate. I guarantee he has opportunities to have sex with women and has chosen not to.


by tame_deuces

A big part of the incel shtick is to be mocked for being an incel, which then allows the incels to go "see?!" and attract more young people who are sexually inexperienced and insecure about it to the cause.

This is a good point. And it also suggests that we should be skeptical when someone who is monetizing incel culture claims to be an incel himself.


by checkraisdraw

I guarantee he has opportunities to have sex with women and has chosen not to.

This is a strange thing to be certain about.


by Trolly McTrollson

This is a strange thing to be certain about.

the rumor is that hes gay


by Trolly McTrollson

This is a strange thing to be certain about.

Why?




Merged Owens and Fuentes thread into right wing grifter mega thread


What if Owens and Fuentes kissed?


by coordi

Merged Owens and Fuentes thread into right wing grifter mega thread

Magic. I’m impressed ////// for Candace enjoyers only: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_f...


by Trolly McTrollson

What if Owens and Fuentes kissed?

She has standards. Fuentes is still a boy


by Trolly McTrollson

What if Owens and Fuentes kissed?

It would be big news.


by QtangPendek

Joins the gov in some way. And she will

Sure. We made a talking head on Fox News Secretary of Defense. We put an antivax nutter who left a bear in Central Park in charge of HHS. We put a surgeon with no background in housing or government in charge of HUD. We tried to make a D-list lawyer who apparently paid a 17 year old for sex the Attorney General (that one didn't work). In MAGA land, anything is possible.


by Rococo

"Takes over the steer" means "become part of an executive?" Now I'm really confused because both phrases are nonsensical.

Maybe 'steer' is short for steering-wheel?


by geezerchess

Maybe 'steer' is short for steering-wheel?



by Rococo

"Takes over the steer" means "become part of an executive?" Now I'm really confused because both phrases are nonsensical.



I think we have found the root of the problem. The formulations you are coming up with may make sense in Polish. But they don't make sense when translated from Polish into English. "Steer" is a verb in English, unless you are referring to a specific type of cattle. You could "take over the steering" or "take over the steering wheel," but you can't "take over a steer." That would be like saying "take over a speak" or "take over an operate."

Likewise, you could "become part of the executive branch of government," but you can't "become part of an executive." In English, "an executive" would be a reference to a specific person, and not necessarily a person in government.


You’re right, mea culpa. Still, she hot


by Rococo

Sure. We made a talking head on Fox News Secretary of Defense. We put an antivax nutter who left a bear in Central Park in charge of HHS. We put a surgeon with no background in housing or government in charge of HUD. We tried to make a D-list lawyer who apparently paid a 17 year old for sex the Attorney General (that one didn't work). In MAGA land, anything is possible.

A daytime ‘doctor’ huckster in charge of Medicare, an owner of WWE in charge of education, another Fox News talking head a circuit court judge

Anything is definitely possible


by StoppedRainingMen

A daytime ‘doctor’ huckster in charge of Medicare, an owner of WWE in charge of education, another Fox News talking head a circuit court judge

Anything is definitely possible

by Rococo

In MAGA land, anything is possible.

Anything? Really? You think well thought out, reasoned decisions are possible in MAGA land? If you say so, but please provide evidence as I am skeptical.

Reply...