War in CEE

War in CEE

Most of the info I came across suggests that an open conflict between Russia and NATO will break out soon (like now). I

25 September 2025 at 11:21 PM
Reply...

199 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

Guys follow this one, you’ll get what I’m trying to say. They are Belarusian journalists that fled Belarus and are corresponding from Warsaw. https://x.com/nexta_tv


crimea is just an example, last week they blew up a refinery near St Petersburg which is near… Finland


Just a moment ago - power plant in Belogrod, Russia. Couple days ago a heat plant in the same city





by QtangPendek

NATO would never do that without the probable cause, that’s why Ukraine is doing it right now, with the probable cause and nato’s missilery: caption says that trump agreed to long range strikes and pi’s shows the first one, heating facility in Belogrod, Russia

Yeah, that was actually in the "real news" last week.


by John21

Yeah, that was actually in the "real news" last week.

Nexta is “real” as well and even entities like World News “Europe” post some real stuff once in a blue moon. The trick is to distinguish which is which


by QtangPendek

Nexta is “real” as well and even entities like World News “Europe” post some real stuff once in a blue moon. The trick is to distinguish which is which

I doubt you're fooling anyone, you know.


by 57 On Red

I doubt you're fooling anyone, you know.

No sir. Have you ever looked through Russian official media statements? It’s all lies. All the public intel that deals with Russia is about people who can decode their publishing. You cannot just reject it, cause there’s no other public info. Rest is proactive intel that people with clearance conduct unofficially, and it’s rarely published. I don’t have such pleasure so I’m extrapolating from what I have


by QtangPendek

Take this, it’s an official Russian foreign ministry statement from today. It’s real cause it’s official, the key is to read it like this: “GRU has planned a sabotage operation abroad but MI6 has prevented it and soon they’ll announce it so Russian Fed. is lying in advance”


by formula72

I agree with this. There really isn't any collective Soviet decision making to preserve the system but just a one man army of unprecedented, centralized power and the Russians, as well as a lot of the world, are at the mercy of whatever he decides to do.But the reality of all of this is that Putin has enough warheads to end civilization. Each warhead is more powerful than a Hi

I don’t think NATO would be escalating like this if we hadn’t left Putin some way to save face. He’s not giving up Crimea, and I think we’d settle for Odessa and some kind of Berlin Wall or a North–South Korea style demarcation line along the land bridge.

Saving face for Putin probably means some kind of guarantee that Ukraine won’t join NATO anytime soon, maybe coupled with a gradual drawdown of NATO support for Ukraine and limited sanctions relief tied to a ceasefire. He’d get to claim he stopped NATO’s expansion and secured “Russian” territory, while the West preserves Ukraine’s sovereignty and avoids a wider war.

Putin could still sell that as a victory. He’d claim Russia stopped NATO’s advance, secured Crimea and the “liberated” regions, reopened trade on Russia’s terms, and forced the West to the negotiating table. He could point to surviving sanctions, keeping control of the Black Sea, and standing firm while the West “blinked.” For his audience, just holding on against the entire Western alliance would be enough to call it a win.


by John21

I don’t think NATO would be escalating like this if we hadn’t left Putin some way to save face. He’s not giving up Crimea, and I think we’d settle for Odessa and some kind of Berlin Wall or a North–South Korea style demarcation line along the land bridge.Saving face for Putin probably means some kind of guarantee that Ukraine won’t join NATO anytime soon, maybe coupled with a g

Yes, he could save his face like this, that would be an ideal scenario and I would vouch for it if possible. There’s one inconsistency tho - he’s bombing Lviv, Lutsk, Rivne and all of western Ukraine too, parts that are more than 1000 km from the region you described. Why is he doing that? And what for?


Also, do you guys also think that patriots are already in Ukraine and prolly have been there long before this whole “discussion” started? It’s war, you don’t democratically debate IF unless you’re already ready


by QtangPendek

Take this, it’s an official Russian foreign ministry statement from today. It’s real cause it’s official, the key is to read it like this: “GRU has planned a sabotage operation abroad but MI6 has prevented it and soon they’ll announce it so Russian Fed. is lying in advance”

No, they're just randomly making stuff up.


by John21

I don’t think NATO would be escalating like this if we hadn’t left Putin some way to save face.

NATO isn't escalating.


Not only is nato not escalating, but Trump basically blamed the war on Zelenskyy, made him grovel in a televised meeting, and briefly stopped providing intelligence.

This gave Putin every chance to de escalate and save face and engage in peace talks under favorable terms. And in response Putin escalated by firing rockets at western Ukrainian cities (which he is still doing) and provoking Europe with drone flybys and alleged cyber attacks.


by 57 On Red

No, they're just randomly making stuff up.

They do, Yes, but not official channels, they use World News Europe and others for that purpose. This screenshot is from an official Foreign Affairs Ministry Facebook account.


by Dunyain

Not only is nato not escalating, but Trump basically blamed the war on Zelenskyy, made him grovel in a televised meeting, and briefly stopped providing intelligence. This gave Putin every chance to de escalate and save face and engage in peace talks under favorable terms. And in response Putin escalated by firing rockets at western Ukrainian cities (which he is still doing) a

That’s right up to one month ago, and now it’s NATO who’s escalating, using Ukraine as a launching pad. It’s good, NATO can’t wait anymore but I’m afraid it’s exactly what Russia wants… don’t get me wrong, I’m just describing current situation and it is like it is. Putin wants more Ukrainian/NATO strikes on Russia territory so he could do a check/raise and force Ukraine to capitulation, and NATO to fence the eastern flank, so both nato&eu would never ever expand into Ukraine, Belarus etc. at least as long as he’s alive. Not sure what he’ll do about the small Baltic former USRR regions. Dependable on how it goes with Ukraine



by 57 On Red

NATO isn't escalating.

Going after their grid is escalation in my mind.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/us-...

WASHINGTON, Oct 1 (Reuters) - The United States will provide Ukraine with intelligence on long-range energy infrastructure targets in Russia, two officials told Reuters on Wednesday, as it weighs whether to send Kyiv missiles that could be used in such strikes.
The U.S. is also asking NATO allies to provide similar support, the U.S. officials said, confirming details first reported by the Wall Street Journal.




https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/09/opini...


by QtangPendek

You ok, like in general? Would you consider reading some books?

You brought up World War II here. I’m not looking for any gotcha moments btw.

Do you believe the holocaust occurred?


by TheKnight00

Do you believe the holocaust occurred?

I don’t. I know it occurred, belief is redundant. It’s called knowledge. You should try it out, it’s great, makes life easier


by QtangPendek

I don’t. I know it occurred, belief is redundant. It’s called knowledge. You should try it out, it’s great, makes life easier

Calm down was a simple question.


by TheKnight00

Calm down was a simple question.

Hardly a simple answer. Maybe you don’t, but some people apply beliefs to facts and that makes me beyond mad. Sorry for my outburst


by John21

Going after their grid is escalation in my mind.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/us-...

Russia has already attacked Ukraine's energy infrastructure, so no.


by 57 On Red

Russia has already attacked Ukraine's energy infrastructure, so no.

Yes, Russia attacked Ukraine’s grid, but Ukraine is not in NATO, and NATO is a defense alliance btw. Not only it’s attacking, but not even in the sake of some member. You have to think broader


by 57 On Red

Russia has already attacked Ukraine's energy infrastructure, so no.

Tit for tat doesn't apply when you're fighting a nuclear superpower who could melt you. And we're thinking about giving Ukraine some Tomahawks? "We'll you used long range missiles on our capital's grid so we used them on Moscow." Bye Ukraine. Highly escalatory.

Reply...