In other news
In the current news climate we see that some figures and events tend to dominate the front-pages heavily. Still, there a
That's awfully funny, because the most famous thing about Comey is that he released information critical of Hilary Clinton just before the 2016 election, which very well could have given the election to Trump.
And, of course, he was a Republican.
That's definitely one guy who I would not mind seeing put away in prison.
The belief in god equivalent is cordie position. cordie decides that something must be true necessarily and uses word to define that. He doesn't want any investigation about facts on those claims.If cordie position became majoritarian, it would still be absurd, same as the belief in god.BUT, if 80% of people believed in what cordie believes, then racism would mean what they cla
Eh, I think it just means that most Americans aren't very smart. This leads them to fall for the lies of politicians who have no intention of helping them in any way.
Would it make you feel better if there were a different word used for the group of people who Coordi things are racist but you don't?
Eh, I think it just means that most Americans aren't very smart. This leads them to fall for the lies of politicians who have no intention of helping them in any way.
Would it make you feel better if there were a different word used for the group of people who Coordi things are racist but you don't?
Yes it would be better in general if the left stopped to violently attempt to redefine the meaning of words .
Like when they invented the utterly redicolous concept of "transphobia", no normal people ever used that, we all mock them when they do use that, at least they didn't rape the dictionary.
when instead they use "woman" to include people with dicks, that's disastrous for society in ways the utterly indefensible concept of "transphobia" isn't
You just said that definitions depend on the opinion of the general population. So how has any change in definition been attempted "violently"?
Yeah I’m not sold on a disclaimer that amounts to “while I’m concluding that Africans are more violent than other races due to genetics and fully disqualifying socioeconomic factors, you shouldn’t use this information to discriminate”
Because what else would that theory be used for?
Sure, I accounted for that when I said “I’m sure he has said some other virulently racist things”. Like you can find quotes of Nick Fuentes saying he thinks race mixing is immoral. Not even looking far, he just had an interview with PBD where he defended that view. You can fight quotes of him saying Jews are unamerican. You can find quotes of him saying whites should move away from cities and stick to their own kind.
Sure, I accounted for that when I said “I’m sure he has said some other virulently racist things”. Like you can find quotes of Nick Fuentes saying he thinks race mixing is immoral. Not even looking far, he just had an interview with PBD where he defended that view. You can fight quotes of him saying Jews are unamerican. You can find quotes of him saying whites should move away
That's awfully funny seeing that he is almost certainly personally the result of race mixing. I guess that could be used as evidence for the belief that it's immoral.
Sure, I accounted for that when I said “I’m sure he has said some other virulently racist things”. Like you can find quotes of Nick Fuentes saying he thinks race mixing is immoral. Not even looking far, he just had an interview with PBD where he defended that view. You can fight quotes of him saying Jews are unamerican. You can find quotes of him saying whites should move away
Fuentes claims Vance is a blood traitor and an enemy of americans because he married an indian woman and had children with her.
That's actual racism, and people like cordie makes it basically impossible to focus on actual racism because they call everything which isn't radical leftism racism. They actively help people like Fuentes
Fuentes is an extreme racist, not an actual racist
Racism is subtle and often obfuscated
Open air racism is a lot less harmful than subtle racism for reasons that should be obvious
Like as an example, someone saying they wouldn’t vote for a *n word* is obviously racist but the person who would never vote for a black person but hides it behind an insurmountable wall of expectations and criticisms is very much a hidden threat
Fuentes is an extreme racist, not an actual racist
Racism is subtle and often obfuscated
Open air racism is a lot less harmful than subtle racism for reasons that should be obvious
Seems debatable
Fuentes claims Vance is a blood traitor and an enemy of americans because he married an indian woman and had children with her.
That's actual racism, and people like cordie makes it basically impossible to focus on actual racism because they call everything which isn't radical leftism racism. They actively help people like Fuentes
Don't you get tired of this? It must be exhausting always blaming the other side. You're basically saying ''no you'' every post you just use a ****ton of words for it.
Fuentes is an extreme racist, not an actual racistRacism is subtle and often obfuscatedOpen air racism is a lot less harmful than subtle racism for reasons that should be obviousLike as an example, someone saying they wouldn’t vote for a *n word* is obviously racist but the person who would never vote for a black person but hides it behind an insurmountable wall of expectations
Nearly every single instance of the most horrendous acts of racial hatred have been carried out by open racists like Nick Fuentes though, would you not agree? Like the holocaust, slavery, genocides, segregation, KKK harassment and murders, etc.
remember that for cordie and his cult, it is racism even to suggest any measurable behavioural difference exists among ethnicities, with a genetical basis.
He insists that's the "socially agreed upon definition", but that's only because he exclusively interacts with other leftists in his life.
That's Two. I suggest you show self-restraint and never post in this thread again.
remember that for cordie and his cult, it is racism even to suggest any measurable behavioural difference exists among ethnicities, with a genetical basis.
He insists that's the "socially agreed upon definition", but that's only because he exclusively interacts with other leftists in his life.
More bullshit from you.
Most people on the left are pretty agnostic on the question of genetic differences between "races" causing differences in intelligence etc because it leads nowhere remotely useful (except in the case of psychopaths like you when it could be used to harm some "races").
I don't understand what this means, i shouldn't post in the "other news" thread which is the most generic one in the forum for all the stuff that doesn't have it's own topic?
And what violation would my post be, other that disagreeing with cordie? is disagreeing with tenets of leftism a violation now?
I can't discuss what racism means even? that's where we are at?
That's two of what exactly?
More bullshit from you.
Most people on the left are pretty agnostic on the question of genetic differences between "races" causing differences in intelligence etc because it leads nowhere remotely useful (except in the case of psychopaths like you when it could be used to harm some "races").
what’s your definition of agnostic? because my intuition is that if you ask most leftists if they believe there is a racial IQ gap that can be attributed (at least partially***) to genetics that they would respond with a resounding “hell no there isn’t”
The glowies aren’t even trying anymore
what’s your definition of agnostic? because my intuition is that if you ask most leftists if they believe there is a racial IQ gap that can be attributed (at least partially***) to genetics that they would respond with a resounding “hell no there isn’t”
Unknown and possibly unknowable.
You should try this approach more often. It leads to better outcomes. I learned this in high school.
so what are you guys even trying to say here; that you aren't racists, just white supremacists?
so what are you guys even trying to say here; that you aren't racists, just white supremacists?
let me ask you 72off, since you are a hasan lover, do you think it’s racist to say that orthodox jews are inbred, which is a favorite joke that hasan, your streamer, likes to make about the orthodox? do you laugh your ass off when he calls random jews inbred? it’s really funny right?
so compared to you and the insanely racist left wing community that you run in, I’m freaking MLK Jr over here.
what’s your definition of agnostic? because my intuition is that if you ask most leftists if they believe there is a racial IQ gap that can be attributed (at least partially***) to genetics that they would respond with a resounding “hell no there isn’t”
Well, any self respecting person would consult google, see that is the current scientific consensus, and would be correct.
This is because there are two sides to the coin; genetic determinism and hereditability.
The simple explanation is that genetic determinism has incredibly low variance while hereditability has extremely large variance
Hereditability isn’t related to genetics specifically though, which is why there is such large variance, because environments are hereditary
We can track changes in IQ of populations over time and see large variances which would lead one to believe that IQ is more hereditary than determined
This is the foundation of IQ science and it spits in the face of people like Luciom
