The "LOLCANADA" thread...again

The "LOLCANADA" thread...again

So what's new?

I've noticed the Liberals are now ahead in all major polls and Trudeau hasn't even started to campaign yet

11 July 2019 at 07:31 PM
Reply...

8906 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by uke_master

LMAO. You're trying to use the shuffle less than 10 days before an election was called as your grand proof against your TDS hatred for Guilbeault? Stop debasing yourself with this TDS bs.

No its a fact. Lets be clear the man is a bum . Now he undercuts the current PM saying no new pipelines as Trans Mountain isn't at full capacity. Maybe your like him and think you can ship oil and NG through the same pipeline. You call Freeland a back stabber yet he is doing the exact same thing and he isn't the minister in charge


by Shifty86

Thoughts on mortgage rates in Canada? Being offered 5 year 4.02 and 3 year 4.12 on a property I bought.

I dreamed of those kind or rates when I was paying off our house. That said, I have no idea if they are good or not.

But, how bad could it be if you lock in for 5 years at 4.02? Rock bottom would be 2% or 2.5%, would it not.

I think I'd lock but it depends on so much (your age, family situation, income, risk tolerance, savings, etc)...


CBC has some daily notes on the EM/ Junior Hockey Players trial.

After reading what Steenbergen testified to today, I am seriously wondering why the Crown ever took EMs case.

I assume the Crown called Steenbergen because he was going to be called by the other side anyway, but how the Crown now goes on to establish there was not consent is puzzling to me (as a layperson).

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/li...


by ArcticKnight

I dreamed of those kind or rates when I was paying off our house. That said, I have no idea if they are good or not.

But, how bad could it be if you lock in for 5 years at 4.02? Rock bottom would be 2% or 2.5%, would it not.

I think I'd lock but it depends on so much (your age, family situation, income, risk tolerance, savings, etc)...

That was my initial thoughts on the 5 yr then the mortgage specialist said he predicts them to be around 3.5 in 3 years but what does he know. Income is fine and I can pay the mortgage off entirely if things get to crazy. Just hate leaving money on the table haha


by lozen

No its a fact. Lets be clear the man is a bum .

Man that TDS hits so hard huh. It's so amusing how you can't hate on trudeau right now and it's seemed to have deflected on this guy. This bit where you act like he's been called on some bluff because Carney kept him in the carekeeper cabinet for 9 ****ing days until the election was called and so if you squint and squirm enough you can pretend this somehow contradicts a bad interpretation of some years ago prior remark....like dude. Relax. Trudeau is gone. Stop the hate train. It's ok to disagree with people on the carbon tax and not think they are a "bum".


by Shifty86

That was my initial thoughts on the 5 yr then the mortgage specialist said he predicts them to be around 3.5 in 3 years but what does he know. Income is fine and I can pay the mortgage off entirely if things get to crazy. Just hate leaving money on the table haha

Maybe variable? If you've got investments you could potentially move around to pay off mortgage if some crazy spike in rates occurs (which I doubt), then I'd probably go variable. I ended up 5 year fixed a year ago back when the inversion was crazy (variable way higher than fixed), but even with that I kinda regret it. Mostly that's because I could pay off the mortgage tomorrow, but I'm basically leveraging relatively cheap mortgage rate to invest more in the markets.


by ArcticKnight

CBC has some daily notes on the EM/ Junior Hockey Players trial.

After reading what Steenbergen testified to today, I am seriously wondering why the Crown ever took EMs case.

Also been following this. The players lawyers are obviously good at what they do but it certainly looks like the women had to much to drink, cheated on her boyfriend, felt guilt and got stuck in this very public trial.


by ArcticKnight

CBC has some daily notes on the EM/ Junior Hockey Players trial.

After reading what Steenbergen testified to today, I am seriously wondering why the Crown ever took EMs case.

I assume the Crown called Steenbergen because he was going to be called by the other side anyway, but how the Crown now goes on to establish there was not consent is puzzling to me (as a layperson).

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/li...

by Shifty86

Also been following this. The players lawyers are obviously good at what they do but it certainly looks like the women had to much to drink, cheated on her boyfriend, felt guilt and got stuck in this very public trial.

The one thing I’m surprised we never heard about is the settlement she reached and for how much and if she has anything left of it

There seem to be so many holes in her accusations I’m not sure how they convict any of them .
Now if this was my son , brother I would be ashamed of their behavior


by uke_master

Man that TDS hits so hard huh. It's so amusing how you can't hate on trudeau right now and it's seemed to have deflected on this guy. This bit where you act like he's been called on some bluff because Carney kept him in the carekeeper cabinet for 9 ****ing days until the election was called and so if you squint and squirm enough you can pretend this somehow contradicts a bad in

Your right he is gone but the damage he has done will carry on for generations as he lives in luxury


by lozen

The one thing I’m surprised we never heard about is the settlement she reached and for how much and if she has anything left of it

There seem to be so many holes in her accusations I’m not sure how they convict any of them .
Now if this was my son , brother I would be ashamed of their behavior

Probably an NDA on the settlement.

I think most people following the whole thing are going to agree the guys are and will be ashamed of what they did, and that the Crown (on EMs behalf) has a real uphill battle trying to prove she did not consent.


by lozen

Your right he is gone but the damage he has done will carry on for generations as he lives in luxury

lmao the carbon tax is gone buddy. It was always deficit neutral, mostly rebated back to the people, and wasn’t around long enough to get to the values to really make a big difference. Just lol of all lols to talk about “generations” suffering. Is this some gimmick where because climate activists note future generations will suffer from our inaction on climate today you want to copy them and pretend a small tax for a couple years does generations worth of damage???

Man the TDS.


There’s a funny self own from conservatives SCREECHING whenever carney signs an order in council or whatever their name is, getting mad at a process detail that is only passing similarity to American executive orders. Like thank you for spreading the message carney is giving everyone a tax cut as if you care one iota about the process details of how.


by lozen

Your right he is gone but the damage he has done will carry on for generations as he lives in luxury

I’m sorry for you .
Me it’s still all good , didn’t see much difference from today and 2015


by lozen

No its a fact. Lets be clear the man is a bum . Now he undercuts the current PM saying no new pipelines as Trans Mountain isn't at full capacity. Maybe your like him and think you can ship oil and NG through the same pipeline. You call Freeland a back stabber yet he is doing the exact same thing and he isn't the minister in charge

Fwiw you saw what’s happening in Saskatchewan and their budget because oil prices too low ?
Deja vu ?
Yup Thats the problem focusing too much on oil economy.
But some just never cant understand ….

There is so much more Canada could do on top of that too.


by uke_master

lmao the carbon tax is gone buddy. It was always deficit neutral, mostly rebated back to the people, and wasn’t around long enough to get to the values to really make a big difference. Just lol of all lols to talk about “generations” suffering. Is this some gimmick where because climate activists note future generations will suffer from our inaction on climate today you want to

The Carbon tax had nothing to do with fighting climate change it was income redistribution .


by uke_master

I mean, he's basically "minister of quebec" these days. And ya, quebec is going to be a problem for the hypothetical idea of an east-west pipeline, not that any company is here to suggest such an thing. With transmountain not yet full it isn't completely obvious which pipeline the pro-pipeline folks actually realistically want.

Oh I am not the only one noting the back stabber. Send him to the back bench were he belongs

Broken YouTube Link

Ya know, it is honestly just refreshing that liberal members are allowed to speak their mind and not be endlessly on the party (aka only the leader/jenni) line at every moment without significant repercussions.

The problem with lozen is you are so endlessly hyperbolic and fixated in your hatred that it's hard to keep things remotely grounded. Like sure, is telling us his anti-pipeline sentiment on day 1 really the best messaging move? No. Is it AT ALL comparable to the stabbing in the back by freeland or some secret sign of being a "bum" or whatever other names you've thrown? No. Just settle down a bit buddy.


by lozen

The Carbon tax had nothing to do with fighting climate change it was income redistribution .

Ok. It can be two things. Is income redistribution from the rich to the poor bad?


by lozen

The Carbon tax had nothing to do with fighting climate change it was income redistribution .

Simple question .
Can inflation changes consumption behaviour ?

why couldn’t tax changes behaviour either ?
U dont believe doubling tax on cigarettes (poor shifty) can make people stop or diminishing smoking ?

If those simple examples seem to ring true to your ears , that higher prices regardless of the reasons it goes higher changes behaviour , why there is a big fat wall when it comes to climate changes and taxes ?


by Montrealcorp

Simple question .Can inflation changes consumption behaviour ?why couldn’t tax changes behaviour either ?U dont believe doubling tax on cigarettes (poor shifty) can make people stop or diminishing smoking ?If those simple examples seem to ring true to your ears , that higher prices regardless of the reasons it goes higher changes behaviour , why there is a big fat wall when it

Oh I thought that it may have an effect on the cars we drive and folks going to more economical vehicles but folks did not
If you need a truck for work you can’t make that change at all . As well you can turn down the thermostat a degree or two but you have to heat your house

Inflation has raised the price of food as well but you need to feed your family ok maybe you don’t get steaks every night


by uke_master

Ya know, it is honestly just refreshing that liberal members are allowed to speak their mind and not be endlessly on the party (aka only the leader/jenni) line at every moment without significant repercussions. The problem with lozen is you are so endlessly hyperbolic and fixated in your hatred that it's hard to keep things remotely grounded. Like sure, is telling us his anti-p

Get your facts straight the back stabbed was Justin Trudeau
Freeland behind closed doors spoke out to Justin about his gimmick GST cut to buy votes when they pledged a 60 billion $ deficit that was going to be a 100 billion. Problem is Justin doesn’t like strong women and demoted her just before she was to deliver the economic situation . She did what many would do and resign her cabinet position .
She single handily saved the liberal party as otherwise Trudeau may have never resigned

Your like a maga loyalist but a Trudeau loyalist


Buddy Trudeau is gone. Let it go! Trying this game of pretending old battles was just about Freeland being a “strong woman”…man…your obsession and seething hatred seeping into everything is not healthy.


Sadly, Poilievre is not gone. He went away on a haitus from X for a while to lick his wounds from losing his own riding - lmao, but with the cabinet announcement, he seems to finally have started up again. And….uh…..it’s exhaustingly same old same old poilievre. No self reflection, no attempts to act with any dignity and work constructively, just back to the endless stupid slogans and partisan attacks.


by uke_master

Ok. It can be two things. Is income redistribution from the rich to the poor bad?

Yes


Ok. Is progressive taxation bad?

Reply...