Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k

Sometimes this is the only way to stop them endless stealing. But sometimes they wake up with some nutted hands. Green tagged whale with before endless raising and then wakes up is always really suspicious.

They realize that any pair, Ahi and Khi are winning calls vs someone that gets it in with 38% equity on average. Printing $$$

Definitely, there is the only way to stop their endless stealing, very wise reply, Paisting never disappoints

Imagine how coolered they feel when you happen to have a good hand.

I'm offering free coaching for you; you don't want them to stop putting money in the pot with bad hands, you want them to make bad decisions in the last 3 streets.

You lose 25bbs on average when they call your allin, that's not how you defend in 3.5 big blind pots.

How after all these years have you still not figured out how to beat the lowest stakes and therefore softest opposition on the planet?

I mean you're not even coming close to being breakeven, and neither is your EV line.

Are you intentionally trying to lose?

Play and show how you win. Would be hilarious to see.

Paisting, other than reading Sklansky 20 years ago do you do any type of study or even watch poker?

Btw Sklansky never advocated shoving 100bbs because someone raised two hands in a row.

Yeah, he needs to play 10 million hands on 2NL to prove it's beatable, not those "lol sample size" 10 to 50k graphs that were posted in this topic.

I think it'd be the best thing ever if Sklansky jumped on this thread and just eviscerated Paisting for misinterpreting his works so badly.

That would be amazing.

Serious question. How bad do you have to be to lose so consistently at 10nl?
Surely majority of pool are not take it even remotely seriously

it's difficult to answer, but you definitely have to be A LOT worse than Achmed.

But David has shown to have a soft spot for those with disabilities.

Paisting what makes you think this player is winning a lot and you're losing a lot at micros? Here is one of his videos 100k hands at 2nl. He has several videos sharing his results at the micros over big samples.

You have to be very bad. As in you have to have been bad during the poker boom and also not gotten any better. Paisting wasn't even winning in 05 and has learned nothing since then.

This is such a great way to put it. Profitable 10nl players today could probably at least break even at 50nl in 2005.

Paisting on the other hand couldn't beat 2nl in 2005 (probably 2003 honestly) and ya, likely hasn't improved at all since then so he's basically trying to play 10nl in 2025 with a below average skill set for early 2000s 2nl

Fixed your post. 😃

I think nl2 was non-existent in 2003-05, the smallest stake was nl10 as far as i remember.

Paisty probably played some sort of shortstack strategy and still has ptsd it seems. He loves a good allin.

Seems like his big hands are holding very well against whales. Different site different story.

Do you think he gets allin pre almost 25% of the time?

Yeah man. That's the only difference.

Whalesting wtf, you were chirping about how noone is beating the games. He does.
Achmed guy’s graph was inflated because he was bumhunting you, but this dude punished legit nl2 players.

Same excuses as before. With poker tracker filters we could easily see that your hands are holding just fine, but you refuse to look at them because they would destroy your coping mechanism about "suckouts".

They don't get it - if your best hands don't win, the rest of your hands follow suit. Nobody wins when their hands don't hold!

Paisting have you changed any part of your strategy over the last 20 years or do you still do everything exactly the same?