Is there evidence that Robbi cheated Garrett?

Is there evidence she was being staked and not just borrowing money?

Also of all the weird stuff that happened, her cheating with Rip was pretty likely, so if he did stake her for whatever reason I mean…

This has made more sense than everything else in here. Probably another thread to go over all this again in five years time.

Unless someone allegedly involved talks then this goes nowhere fast.

[QUOTE=Robot9999;59291251
If this is not accurate, possibly list some staked backed players that are horrible and the reasoning of their backers to stake them.
.[/QUOTE]

Poker Bunny. Your eyes and what you know about human nature can tell you the probable reason.

OK. You want to double down on reading too much into normal human behavior. Your choice.

Conspiracies were built on less.

Irony is the best form of humor. Hands down.

Just because criminals do stupid shit does not make all people who do stupid shit criminals. Otherwise you would be in jail.

Think about it.

The irony.

I'm not saying somebody who did something stupid is obviously guilty, I'm just saying I'm not assuming innocence based off stupidity either. Jesus man. If stupidity was a crime, I would have been thrown in jail a long time ago, but you'd be in the cell next to me.

A retrospective that Limon and I did on the j4 hand. We go over the various factors people believed she cheated and explain why we see all those reasons as quite weak. We discuss some things I’ve never seen other people discuss (eg, fact that the chaos after the J4 hand was the perfect spot for Bryan to steal chips, so it’s a mistake to think him doing that there was any sort of evidence of him being in cahoots with Robbi).

The video: https://www.youtube.com/live/-1hgj5ck2Q8...

Yes, I remember that. It was nice albeit reductive but that works for your audience I suppose.

That was my point. Everyone would be.

There's so many 'if they were cheating why would they do ...' scenarios.

Eric Persson was only $2m into his $6-7m live game downswing, of all the people to cheat why would they pick the one with the highest likelihood of being called out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLHp2OpJ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTMcAWB5...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ov-dRg3I...

It's funny that everyone is going on about how no one could be as bad as Robbie whilst Eric is sat right there at the table playing some of the worst televised poker in history.

In retrospect, the mega threads that got closed and the 100's of hours of videos on the topic should be a case study on sexism, misogyny and homophobia in the poker community. Regardless of who is right, the amount of people adding nothing of substance and just resorting to personal attacks is pretty vile and paints a bleak picture of inclusivity in poker.

Wtf Noobtard. How do those three hands and the reactions equate to the Robbi J4 hand? And the rest of the post is just jibberish. Homophobia?

If they had the means to cheat the HCL game why would they not chose to steal from Eric Person, the billionaire whale at the table who was giving away money on all the live streams.

In terms of the homophobia thing, there were loads of posts in the previous threads questioning Garretts sexuality. Similarly to how loads of people were bashing on Robbi's appearance.

At the end of the day it's 4 years later and nothing has changed in terms of the conversations because no new evidence has come to light.

Yes there is a lot of evidence. circumstantial evidence is still evidence. People have been convinced of murder on less. You rarely get a smoking gun in the court of law

So your take 4 years later is that, if they cheated, they should have cheated a different player. Got it.

I doubt there are many legitimate murder convictions based on autistic people thinking they can read minds, but sure, whatever keeps you guys fish

Not sure the last time I posted but chiming in to echo this. I remember this hand. What a time to be alive.

when a women is murdered probably rightfully so the husband is always the suspect and when in court its way easier to convict him in front of a jury of his peers because 95%+ of the time its always the husband . When a randon new fish calls with j4 high it should be the same idea

You think that the type of circumstantial evidence that we have in this case is equivalent to what you would need to convict someone of murder? I mean for one thing there’s not even enough evidence to show beyond a reasonable doubt, or even to a 50+1% standard that cheating even occurred, let alone that Robbi specifically cheated.

I doubt anyone in this thread could even put together a coherent theory of the case, let alone put together enough evidence to convict her.

Robbi is apparently looking at the table... Detective: 'She does look off into the distance...' Man, nobody sees what you see.

In the US approximately 12-18% of women are killed by their legal husband.

If stats aren't your thing, you can always quit poker and try law.

Or maybe you were thinking of a different country?

If your point was to misrepresent through a narrow definition of legal husband, congratulations. Based on recent data, over 55% of female homicide victims in the United States are killed by a current or former intimate partner.

I read the phrase literally and provided precision. You are welcome to change the goalposts from "husband" to "former intimate partner" however it suits you. Likewise I deserve the same courtesy to claim that she held JTcc and made a great call.

But who cares if it's 95%, 55% or 15%? Whether or not she cheated is more in line with religious dogma than math, and making RJL the new FSM is more fun anyways.

We are all luckier for the event. We can all look forward to reading a great book in the near future, and maybe, just maybe, GMAN is reading these comments from on high with a nice glass of bourbon laughing at all of us.

You might want to rephrase that so it's more clear and accurate.

Touche.

i just threw out a high number your overthinking it. what's the difference between 95% or 55%? your still always the number one suspect. even with your made up number of 12% that would still make you the number one suspect